Philipp
Philipp
I think, `makeFieldLabelsWith noPrefixFieldLabels` with the [optics](https://hackage.haskell.org/package/optics-core-0.3/docs/Optics-Label.html) package produces the instances @neongreen wants.
It is not obvious to me why this would be "nice". Sure, it saves a bit of vertical space. But vertical space is not as precious as horizontal space because...
As an aside, Ormolu is currently following the official elm style guide in this regard. > Always bring the body of the declaration down one line. https://elm-lang.org/docs/style-guide#declarations EDIT: At least...
@thomasjm , I am very sorry for having kept you waiting. No, the pragmas were not causing me any problems. I opened the pull request just to demonstrate to me...
> From what I can tell, the warning you reference applies only to `OverlappingInstances` and not to the newer `OVERLAPPING` pragmas. It applies to the pragmas too. Almost all dangers...
fixed by https://github.com/tweag/rules_haskell/pull/2125
@DolceTriade i have not checked which versions this breaks compatibility with (of bazel, `rules_java`) yet but we can still do that before the next release. so i will try to...
no worries, ben. we have not even released the `rules_nixpkgs` version yet that these instructions are for. so i am not sure if it makes sense to merge already.
ah. sorry about that.
can we get a "c api" label?