AlexL
AlexL
p.s. it was ver 0.6.12. Ver 0.6.14 throws `unexpected keyword argument 'strict'` but it was needed by https://github.com/1200wd/bitcoinlib/issues/338 Without that "strict" the same error as above.
@arshbot could you please explain why it "doesn't have an address in the traditional sense"? I see the block reward is passed to 196 addresses. Does the error appear because...
Thank you for the explanation. Whilst the library author is away - could you please share your fix, either in the form of PR or not? Thank you very much.
@arshbot, please ^_^
Look for Download section in README