Philip Prindeville
Philip Prindeville
I think we've gotten most of the major issues with the current release put to bed, with the one exception of supporting both static and dynamic builds... Issue #98 I...
Okay, I just did a merge of `master` into `v1.5.x` branch so it should have all the latest fixes.
Is there a PR that goes with this?
Now is there a PR?
Well, we can either patch the source to be C89 syntax, or we can fix the Makefile to explicitly specify C99... I'm fine with either approach.
Actually, this is fixed in PR #70. Can you try building master? Or 1.5.0-beta.1?
I'm more current on the Tacacs+ protocol than the PAM API, so someone else will need to answer this. Can we store the `task_id` in a `struct pam_data` hanging off...
In general, I'm opposed to this change. We're seeing an increase of session parameters (not a bad thing) but they're being added as globals (which is a bad thing). Please...
@stanAtAtl: > Having had a look at PR #78, it may not be a very bad idea to make srcaddr a member of struct tac_session, but I failed to see...