Sakari Poussa
Sakari Poussa
Hi @linsun, @howardjohn and thanks for the update. We will do the following things to clarify the benchmarking numbers in the blogpost: - [x] 1. We will add a paragraph...
Yes, we'll do that. It is step number 3 above. Need to get bigger instance (more vCPUs) since everything won't fit into 4 vCPU as we did for the blog...
[Here](https://gist.github.com/poussa/9343de35bfea4c76c8643643cc76b515) are the details how we currently run the benchmarking. That is, client (k6), gateway and server (fortio) are all in separate nodes.
@linsun @howardjohn we re-run the numbers on single node cluster (GCP, updates in [gist](https://gist.github.com/poussa/9343de35bfea4c76c8643643cc76b515)). Not much change in the numbers (need to check why the CryptoMB numbers aren't better). So...
Fixed and verified in the 0.4.1 image. Still waiting to see the fix in the src tree.
This need bit more planning. That is, we need to separate at least the following data types inside the Web USB connection. 1. Control messages between the IDE and ashell...
Yeah, this is not very practical for zephyr.js. It is more a browser api which we dont have. I dont feel we should start adding it just because browsers have...
Z will have new IP stack and http lib soon. This feature should be built using those.
Yes, we want more Node.JS APIs, UDP is low hanging fruit so +1 for that.
@kbalka About kops vs no kops option. Can we make it so, if you give the -k option it means use kops and if you don't it means no kops....