Giulio Piacentino
Giulio Piacentino
Agreed! We need this. I really think this kind of minor suggestions are important! So they are not so minor after all! :)
Here is the first improvement for this thread. I realize this is just a small thing, but it should be still a first step for improving this. I would like...
Yes, thanks, @AndersDeleuran -- we know this and we usually suggest it. The only issue with this is finding these .dlls and keeping them in the right spot. We are...
I'm not sure about this, but my first impression is that we should use the same code we use for component names also for inputs and outputs. Then, if names...
That would also work, sure.
It is and will always be possible to add paths manually with this syntax: import sys if not my_path in sys.path: sys.path.append(my_path) import my_library
I think I would need some interventions in the main Rhino.Python plugin for this, as the ghPython component is, among other things, a trimmed-down version of the same editor that...
The AddRectangle call works also well because Grasshopper is able to convert a 4-pointed polyline in a rectangle if that is necessary, but the information is not retained for boxes....
Right now they are swallowed and it's not apparent how to trace them back
Newer versions of Rhino 5 have an improved code folding strategy. Just making a function should make the inner scope properly foldable. Does it help?