Philipp Aaron Becker
Philipp Aaron Becker
Exactly the same situation here. Is there any other way to overwrite the client id through configuration?
This is still blocking me from upgrading to version 5. I cannot change the requirements on the other side. Would still be happy about @zmstone 's proposal above (https://github.com/emqx/emqx/issues/8498#issuecomment-1189936686)
Hi @kschiffer > I've also added functionality to add field masks for custom webhooks. This does not work for me. I think, I am the first wanting to use `field-mask`...
Thanks @kschiffer . I edited my question to be more precise on what was not working. Hopefully your colleagues can have a look and help.
@kschiffer amazing! I assume, you meant https://github.com/TheThingsNetwork/lorawan-stack/pull/6204 instead of https://github.com/TheThingsNetwork/lorawan-stack/pull/5655 (which is this PR) 👍
Another question. How come that the paths in field-mask diverge from the paths in the Webhook's payload? **Example for the spreading factor** ``` field-mask - mask up.uplink_message.settings.data_rate.modulation.lora.spreading_factor ``` and in...
Hi @jdemaeyer > it would dramatically increase the size of our database I agree, it should be optional if it gets added. > However, a lot of this hassle could...