Patrick Hesselberg

Created a quickfix for my own app until this has been fixed: ``` data() { return { atSearch: '', } } ... handleAt: function(chunk) { // See https://github.com/fritx/vue-at/issues/65 if (this.atSearch...

If you click "details" doesn't it say "Approve" or something like that? No idea about adding users as a validator - I will find out!

While we wait for this to get merged in here is a little filter that might help you: ``` add_filter( 'cmb2_render_pw_map', function() { wp_deregister_script( 'pw-google-maps-api' ); wp_register_script( 'pw-google-maps-api', '//maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/js?libraries=places&key=', null,...

@owenvoke Thanks! I really agree with you. Setting `--ci` in CI by default seems like a very Laravel-y thing to do. I personally would like it to automatically resolve that...

How would you suggest dealing with the key?

Would give it a try :)

Just updated to 4.5.1 and my tests are breaking. See #192 as well. Could this be rolled back to prevent breaking changes in a minor version?

Using the [custom builder](https://github.com/larastan/larastan/blob/bdfb2131b02a1bcfb78e253abd4db761acd2cc8d/docs/features.md#custom-model-builders) example I'm getting: ``` PHPDoc tag @return contains generic type App\Builders\UserBuilder but class 1 App\Builders\UserBuilder is not generic. ``` Adding builder: ``` /** @extends Builder */...

https://github.com/larastan/larastan/pull/2036/files#diff-aff15ced1fe37506f41f2e1d93a4d8312529259f7803f8634ffb5eac4de47823R53 Since this one extends `Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Builder` which is generic, shouldn't the `UserBuilder` in this case also be generic?

Hi @canvural . Sorry to bother, but since you already stated your would make a release 3 days ago would you be able to make a release for this anytime...