Pearl Li

The problem appears to be that you have to specify the full module path for each type in the call to `translate`. In v0.6, this works for me: ```julia julia>...

@adicunningham I just posted a response to your Discourse thread (not sure where the best place to continue this discussion is?)

I also have encountered this error and haven't been able to come up with an MWE. But it seems like the problem is here: https://github.com/Nosferican/Econometrics.jl/blob/014636502fcc09179dbd8eab58e82c9ff07872e2/src/solvers.jl#L116 and also on lines 23...

Thanks! Yes, in my case, I see the error when running 2SLS. When I add `@show lin_ind` and `@show typeof(lin_ind)` above line 116, I see: ```julia lin_ind = [1, 2,...

Okay, here's a CSV of sample data (apologies for the presentation!): ``` V,d,p,c1,c2,r2,p̃,j 1.2027419218197932,27.703656833029616,0.0,false,false,false,0.0,1 1.075147895949145,26.275771622919024,0.0,false,false,false,0.0,1 0.9313659184439649,30.378364038034068,0.0,false,false,true,0.0,1 1.0761276167040825,29.045430133131287,0.0,false,false,true,0.0,1 1.157924142455271,26.6897777510207,0.0,false,false,true,0.0,1 1.2602159294494486,23.564996779476353,0.0,false,false,true,0.0,1 1.0691480410425707,24.302754839676016,0.0,false,true,false,0.0,1 0.9747923308125769,27.93962459498397,0.0,false,false,false,0.0,1 1.0864642002730331,29.43234468759983,0.0,false,false,true,0.0,1 0.8280195291069027,36.454816370348006,0.0,true,false,false,0.0,1 0.9938150611635577,25.882930650932604,0.0,false,false,false,0.0,1 1.1902971518664769,28.003360206792166,0.0,false,false,false,0.0,1 0.8440652135748151,27.186667855146023,0.0,false,false,true,0.0,1 1.1942135229240978,24.793572848996735,0.0,false,false,false,0.0,1 0.9749415395991344,32.231070524734776,0.0,false,false,false,0.0,1 1.0630157511408558,29.954964998040836,0.0,false,false,true,0.0,1 1.2088620878197598,28.88111761520257,0.0,false,false,false,0.0,1...

Thanks for taking the lead on this, @davidanthoff!

@ikarib, I addressed the `Rstard` definition in 22d7d870. Thanks for pointing this out!

Regarding bug 2, the given prior density refers to the square root of the inverse gamma distribution. This is because we put priors on standard deviations, not variances, in our...

Just to make sure, are you using the most recent commit (currently 22d7d870ffbe0f4c7ebf83a7125f922b2c681445)? This problem was hopefully addressed in #5. Also, as I say there, this code was written for...

@davidanthoff That was exactly it, thank you! I feel a little silly now...