Maor Zamski
Maor Zamski
@idoo, that's a good suggestion. I'll look into it.
I had the same problem. I've verified that the following https://github.com/substack/browser-pack/compare/master...jmm:standalone-require3 works! would be cool if it would be merged.
just my 2 cent: IMO a validation library should support async validators. Letting the user write a custom async validation rule, using whichever ajax api/library/module he wishes.
@s-yadav, sure I can rebase and solve the conflict. But, maybe this is too early to get into master branch? We need to map how this feature will behave with...
@griable, tnx for reporting this issue. I understand the issue. The easiest way I would get around this would be to to use the cli version of scopify https://github.com/pazams/scopify-cli ....
Thanks for the contribution, and sorry for missing this :pray: Merging this now, and will release on npm by tomorrow EOD.
`isSupportedContract(contract c)` is a made up wrapper and defined to be equal to : `c.supportsInterface(interface a) or c.supportsInterface(interface b)` Since `a` and `b` are hardcoded, it made sense to me...
Nice catch @akhil0001 . Will update this soon!
Absolutely, I probably just misunderstood your comment from https://github.com/veqryn/slog-context/issues/34 > I'd be happy to accept a PR from you that moves the logic to the root package Please see the...
> looks good. i am just debating in my head if I want the method to be called `Add` or something else, like `With` Happy to rename any method -...