PavelTheCoder
PavelTheCoder
@leocornelius Yes, it's working. You can use my forked version pusblished on NPM here https://www.npmjs.com/package/localtunnel-socks-client
Failing coverage check is apparently caused by the file/code used for typeforce extension. Suggestions?
Hi @junderw. I don't want to sound pushy or anything because I know you are very busy and the whole bitcoinjs ecosystem is very complex. I just wanted to ask...
Is there any way to compile to WASM with some workarounds? Is this gonna be resolved in near future?
I have the same issue. Has this project been discontinued?
I did some research and from what I observed, there isn't a widely-used validation library that has more than one maintainer. Some people might suggest AJV but that doesn't really...
@motorina0 I see several issues with typeforce. - It is unmantained - last change 2 years ago - no ES module support - minor issue in this case - very...
@samholmes That might be good for JSON types but we're looking for something that can validate low-level JS natives like `Uint8Array` and with specific length as well. From a quick...
@samholmes To be honest, I don't see much added value over custom type guards in this case. And since I assume that @junderw would probably want to go with something...
I have found out through direct experience (replacing typeforce on my fork of bip32) that the best replacement is the [ow library](https://github.com/sindresorhus/ow). It has very similar API to typeforce and...