Rajarsi

Hey! I was thinking about what we were trying to do here. (** Btw the link you have provided in the comment appears to be void ; ) Anyway I...

> My opinion is that it would be best to have a new class (some simplified version of qiskit implementation I imagine) here, for better maintainability. I agree we would...

Hello again. I was still working to get this done, so for now I was trying to get a skeleton structure of the parameterization using the qiskits `Parameter` class from...

Thank you for reading my comments, > I personally think we do not need to worry about such case for now - I believe standard quantum-classical algorithms like QAOA update...

>thanks for your reply, I might add one comment here. The byproduct correction is not dependent on the angle of the measurement basis, if the plane (e.g. XY, YZ) is...

> I do not think such a case is realistic - any measurement command that depend on this 'placeholder measurement signal' cannot be performed because you cannot determine the measurement...

Thank you for commenting. But I also had another question in this regard, I am having facing some ambiguity here. Firstly I see we have checks against the flow conditions...

I see. I remember reading in your paper that flow isn't conserved upon the Pauli Optimisation scheme the paper introduces but yet it is still deterministic. But wasn't gflow a...

I see, Actually to my knowledge I undesrtood the "flow" conditions to be the only criterion to be satisfied for determinism, maybe I should have alook at the reference for...

Another question, Why do we need this operation while appending Measurement Commands `self.output_nodes.remove(cmd[1])` ?