Pablo Fernandez

It would be useful to consider a PR-style event where a pubkey suggests making a change to an event beyond the scope of this NIP alone. I've seen a few...

> @pablof7z @hzrd149 do you feel this is ready to merge? Yes

> @pablof7z it seems 31337 is used both in NIP 89 and for zapstr.live. Any preference for how to handle that collision? I think probably creating a new kind for...

> I've just published a test event of one of Ainsley's tracks according to this draft spec, event id: `1d8d62cf5f11d6cb6ce9944170753a0fdbf25ec26573ff68b2eecc761323f46d`. It should be readable from our relay (relay.wavlake.com) > >...

> At first @fiatjaf noticed gossip-as-bunker didn't work with nak. Then @bu5hm4nn noticed Coracle didn't work with gossip-as-bunker. Then I noticed habla didn't work as gossip-with-bunker. > > > >...

I just skimmed a bit of this very funny discussion, here are my two sats: comparing previous attempts to replace RSS for podcast distriibution with replacing it with nostr is...

why introduce a new command? why not just a kind that implies a relay-admin's action? we'll definitely want more relay admin-commands, introducing a new verb for each seems unnecessary e.g....

yeah, I was going to propose using kind 5 actually and then thought there could be push back on overloading the functionality of kind 5, but I think this makes...

> > It feels to me like "I have a hammer therefore everything is a nail". We have an event structure, therefore everything must be an event. > > Look...

> Maybe we should make this into a big "discoverability" NIP and have a table like in NIP-51 with all the possible kinds of things that can be discovered? Starting...