Manuel Ortega
Manuel Ortega
This one should be fixed as #11531 is merged! cc @Ducasse @MarcusDenker
@acesuares If you have extra comments about this, just add them here.
@acesuares please, let me know what you think about this? please explore this [link](https://github.com/thredded/thredded_create_app/blob/master/lib/thredded_create_app/generator.rb#L65)
@acesuares We reverted it in a project but not in the gem.
- cancan or cancancan: decide on correct version for new apps. Thhis I have now in some apps: gem 'cancan', :git => 'https://github.com/acesuares/cancan.git', :branch => '2.0' in other: gem 'cancan',...
@acesuares hi! I did an exploration about this and my conclusion is that we shoudn't revert cancancan. We should keep using it in the inline_forms gem. Look CanCan is not...
@acesuares having both bootstrap and foundation is a lot of extra work. We have to choose one of them. My vote is for bootstrap and the current implementation is fully...
@acesuares please explore this issue, I made it from you email, we should one a new issue for each checkbox, I already did for the cancan and the bootstrap ones
I'll work on this!
@voodoorai2000 Hi! Working on this I found that Legislation processes don't belong to an User. So, I get this error `undefined method author=' for #` on this [line](https://github.com/consul/consul/blob/master/spec/shared/features/nested_documentable.rb#L9) Once I...