Omkar Moghe
Omkar Moghe
@madejejej Found this issue because we're also facing some friction with the flexibility of the `science` method. I agree with the idea of allowing you to just pass an experiment...
@davishmcclurg just made another round of updates and added tests for each configuration option. lmk if you have any feedback!
hey sorry for the huge delay, been a busy few weeks 😓 will do another pass and incorporate all the feedback this weekend 🙏🏽
Hey sorry for the delay here, apologies for not getting back to you, totally cool with you making any of the style changes you suggested to confirm with the rest...
@alexpech12 So I ended up taking a stab at an alternate implementation of a Ruby experimentation lib that's heavily inspired by Scientist, but addresses the concerns you and others in...
Hi @drwl! Good to hear from ya 🤙🏽 That looks like a great option, I'm going to experiment with your fork and if it works, we'd love to switch over...
> I imagine we would want to provide global options for everything (not just `formats`) Agreed! I generally like this approach to making gems configurable: https://dev.to/vinistock/make-a-ruby-gem-configurable-228d Basically a `Configuration` singleton...
Hi @davishmcclurg, apologies for the delay, been a busy month/holiday season. I'm working on implementing this now! Should have a PR up this week 🤞🏽
Working in this branch: https://github.com/omkarmoghe/json_schemer/tree/default-config
Also facing the same issue, using the `ruby-lsp` extension as well.