Shlomtz
Shlomtz
Thanks @durgeshp-crypto. About this specific feature - do you want to give it a try? about HD: @elichai , you might have some thoughts on this ?
thank you !!
You should be able to make a PR as usual . What error do you get ?
Hi @khaq , ideally we want to avoid reconstructing the key, because it misses the point of running threshold (distributed) signing. It can be useful for recovery. I suggest you...
good question. I think that in this context it is interesting to compare performance
@robertsdotpm are you referring for example to party2 not validating party1 local sig s1: https://github.com/KZen-networks/multi-party-schnorr/blob/master/src/protocols/aggsig/test.rs#L83 ? If this is the case : 1) From technical point of view adding verification...
Yes, verifying a partial signature is the same as verifying the aggregated signature. It can be done by calling `verify` with that party public key and ephemeral public key. The...
cool! feel free to pr this test. you made a good point here - the current `verify` method cannot be used for partial signature verification (because it is assumed that...
Nice. making the syntax more readable: ``` pub fn verify_partial( signature: &FE, r_x: &BigInt, c: &FE, a: &FE, key_pub: &GE, ) -> Result { let g: GE = ECPoint::generator(); let...