Jon Leech

We can put that on the queue for the next time we do a spec update. From the wording I suspect that was a to-do item that was lost track...

@NogginBops is correct. The only way there would ever be a new OpenGL core revision is a combination of strong developer demand and a set of compelling, major new features...

Being confrontational is not going to help. But it will discourage people from engaging with you. The amount of work involved in providing a new extension is a significant cost...

> > I see no reason why a specification-based solution is required > > Well, I do see reason to do so. The specification is flawed and dis-FUNC-tional, it's implementation...

GLX and GL spec sources aren't public, and GLX has been updated so rarely I haven't even moved it out of SVN into internal gitlab, which will be required since...

If you would like to propose schema and schema documentation updates to allow \ blocks similar to \ blocks, that would be fine. I don't think we would have that...

IIRC somebody did something along these lines in a Google Summer of Code project a long time ago. It's very difficult to parse the arbitrary content in these documents though,...

In particular reformatting the documents stands a significant chance of screwing up things that are intended to be tables, equations, diagrams in ASCII text.

Sorry for the delay responding. I'd like to do a sanity check with Mesa, since they're probably the only OpenGL project still supporting any kind of Solaris drivers, and if...

This is the canonical source, but since the combination of Solaris + GLX is only supported by Mesa, AFAIK, it seems prudent to check with them as I have no...