nworbnhoj

I have researched this issue a little and have a rough plan to go forward. I would value any feedback or insights at this point ..... **BACKGROUND** The "Attempt to...

Some of these comments make me a little sad. I think that Gargoyle is a really good bit of gear because it fills a very common household need AND it...

Great discussion :-) And quickly outgrowing the topic - very great. Could I suggest that we should Host this larger discussion more formally amongst Gargoyle developers and construct a **Vision**...

I have roughed out a basic [GitHub wiki home page](https://github.com/ericpaulbishop/gargoyle/wiki) as a basis for planning Gargoyle development effort. It would be good to flesh out the steps involved in each...

Question @ericpaulbishop: Do you personally wish to implement these three large major development or are you looking for help with them? If you are looking for help then what role...

So @ericpaulbishop if you were to setup a captive-portal branch (and merge the master in every now and again) @lantis1008 and I could start poking around at it.

OK great - thanks for the "heads up" There are a number of logical "next steps" to this development. For example, a Device Group: - should be a valid option...

Note that, I have departed from the Gargoyle norm for the behaviour of the Edit Button on the Gargoyle - Connections - Devices page. The edit behaviour is hopefully intuitive...

So I have now completed the basic implementation that I had in mind for Device Groups including Quotas, Restrictions and QoS. I suspect that people will want to use Device...

Just realized that I have not implemented Groups into the edit dialogs for each of Quotas, Restrictions and 2 x Qos. I will complete this over the next day or...