nullswan
nullswan
unicorn
> Thanks for making an Awesome list! raised_hands > > It looks like you didn't read the [guidelines](https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome/blob/master/pull_request_template.md) closely enough. I noticed multiple things that are not followed. Try going...
> Hi @c3b5aw, > > Hope you are doing well. I noticed just a couple formatting-related issues but nothing too crazy. > > * Includes a project logo/illustration whenever possible....
Hello @sindresorhus, This is ready for review.
@nikitastupin Please, highlight changes your disagree with. Suggest the features you wants, I'll work on the todos.
> Hey @c3b5aw, > > Thank you very much for the PR. I've skimmed the changes and left few comments. Other than that we're good. > > Regarding further feature...
Hello @ardatan, Thanks for your contribution ! We did not wanted this behavior at first as it would missmatch with the apollo usage. (which uses validationsRules, plugins etc...) However this...
Will be wrapped with #89
I am afraid this reduce too much the scope of possibility, allowing Armor to only patch plugins. I will think about some changes.
> Indeed @ardatan ! I suggest #113 so we do not allocate EnvelopArmor within the array. However, I noticed a drawback of this usage, it seems like the field suggestion...