Naomi Penfold

I found this review really useful, in particular: > the experience of ReScience suggests that effective code review requires rapid interaction between authors and reviewers referring to a common codebase....

Hello, it's absolutely fine on our end to not include any attribution if that is what is ok with everyone. I'll remove the credit line, unless anyone objects by November...

Hi everyone, we're on table 13, the best number, also working on #72 if you're curious about journal policies on preprinting and peer review. In person doers, come by for...

Having a fascinating convo re benefits, concerns with and needs for infrastructure around preprints with @domroche @ashleydfarley @monsauce : * need metrics (e.g. altmetrics) to be consolidated between preprint and...

Irene @iramosp, Ibraheem @ibsali33 and Angela @zebraelement joined us for discussion and we identified some ways we could support the community to discuss openness (and some of the key values...

# Update on OpenCon community call, Nov 28 * Preprints are complete scientific manuscripts shared online before peer review, and ASAPbio is a non-profit organisation supporting the adoption of preprinting...

I love this idea and that you submitted it as a project here @NouranRezk - thank you! Sorry I didn't get a chance to contribute earlier. I think this could...

For anyone interested in working on this in-person at OpenCon, please check in with me there :)

A relevant piece shared today on Scholarly Kitchen, and authored by the TRANPOSE team, explaining some of the aims behind TRANSPOSE: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/11/01/guest-post-help-transpose-bring-journal-policies-into-the-open/

**More ways to contribute: how would you use this resource?** * Would you find a resource that clarifies journal policies on preprinting (such as licensing requirements, versions you can post,...