Hector
Hector
I'll be writing the documentation if the community thinks this PR can be merged. Looking forward to read what you all think !
Hi @bmatusiak ! Why will it break app? Also... why would it be bad to have a short-hand to quickly the database ? It is useful, isn't it ? Thank...
Ok. I see. However... isn't it a problem to use 2 instances of gun in the same file? Also, we can work this out?
Guys. I think it's still a good idea but as @bmatusiak said... maybe it is not very interesting. I'll be closing the PR for now. You can re-open it later...
# What's next for asynchronous gun? ## I. Rethinking its implementation The `inject`, if I'm being honest is a ~way~ to correct a design flaw. We could at this point...
Hey @bmatusiak! Hey @amark ! Going back to you. I've been working on prototype. It's quite hard messing with gun source code because it is complex. @bmatusiak, the idea that...
I just read what you've written and I think it's very cool to develop the feature to be not only useful but also allowing extensibility by making it **flexible** !...
It'd be excting for code quality!
@amark Done ! I've asked them to come here!
I don't know how to solve this issue but what do you think of this simple solution : ```js const Gun = require('gun'); const gun = Gun(); let bob =...