Dmitrii Nikitin

Nice idea! But should we add an option to enable/disable such optimization per operation, per `StorIOSqlite`? Could it happen that precompile + single bind will be less efficient then single...

What is the way to mock StorIOContentResolver?

Would it be right to have 3 sample projects? 1) [basic sample](https://github.com/pushtorefresh/storio/tree/master/storio-basic-sample-app) on java as is to explain how to get started 2) samples on java, with separate screen on...

Good idea to move this check to compile time, but marker interface itself will not force you to add type mapping. It looks like excess step and it will be...

Can you please try something some like this? ```java try (Cursor cursor = storIOSqlite .get() .cursor() .withQuery(RawQuery.builder() .query("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM some_table WHERE some_field =?") .args("some_value") .build()) .prepare() .executeAsBlocking() ) {...

You can use `storIOSQLite#lowLever` for this: ```java StorIOSQLite.LowLevel lowLevel = storIOSQLite.lowLevel(); lowLevel.beginTransaction(); try { // code that should be execute inside single transaction lowLevel.setTransactionSuccessful(); } finally { lowLevel.endTransaction(); } ```

@Reagankm thank you! But we should make it over rxjava2 migration and check if emitter is not disposed [here](https://github.com/pushtorefresh/storio/commit/fbd8e550710a12e641f0bf398e329ab88a1bba91#diff-4c7aa1ae15e9319df7e0b5d5a00ef236R28). Otherwise we will meet conflict =(

I completely agree! And I am certain this is bug, that we haven't done this yet! 🍺🍺🍺 Sure I will invite guys!

@artem-zinnatullin may we drop old SQLite support in v4?

@artem-zinnatullin there is request for such api from @karlicoss