Nathaniel Fitzenrider

Any code in the Metastream Remote extension after seems to not have a license on purpose. The latest Metastream versions that are still free software are anything before that, ~~and...

I did want to note that the [addon page on AMO](https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/metastream-remote/) still says it's under the Expat/MIT License. I'm guessing that either only applies to the compiled form or is...

~~Wanted to also add that the latest free Metastream Remote commit is (based on the [commit history]), and thus the latest Metastream Remote version that is free software is 0.4.1,...

Did you check the [FAQ](https://github.com/samuelmaddock/metastream/wiki/FAQ)?

@Flame442 ~~Red is only licensed under the GPL, not the AGPL, so there is no requirement for a `licenseinfo` command on modified bots, also because the output of `licenseinfo` doesn't...

I honestly think the dislike count should be *hidden* if the like count is hidden as well. I think it's in the spirit of this extension to essentially bring back...

@MenosGrante is there any reason you couldn't make a separate fully free build, for inclusion in F-Droid? If you made a request using that variant, they'd most likely approve it.

[`GPL-3.0-or-later`] is a good license. I think the code is long enough that the extra burden of including the license text is okay. Regardless of what license you pick, just...

> I would personally dissuade people from using AGPL if they are copyleft, as of the four fundamental freedoms that underpin the copyleft movement, only three are guaranteed by the...

@JuhaJGamer alright, well, another info dump. Also, the late reply is fine (I do it all the time lol). Text dump (click to reveal) To be honest, my previous argument...