Nehal Adel
@walaj I have the very same error too. Is it related to the conda version of svABA??
@walaj any advice?
@shashank-KU Did you figure out why? @tseemann prokka was running fine then suddenly I had this error explained here, any advice?
I have the same one too with a couple of other errors: ``` * 0:00:17.358 104M / 8G WARN General (simplification.cpp : 479) The determined erroneous connection coverage threshold may...
@prihoda I actually installed DeepBGC today as guided by creating a new conda environment and followed each step, however, when I tried `deepbgc pipeline contig.fasta`, I encountered an error due...
I had the same issue. Try to update the vfdb first by `abricate-get_db --db vfdb --force` and rerun your samples.
@gizzlev Did you manage to figure out the reason behind this difference?
@ghs101 Did you manage to solve this?
@tseemann I was going to ask the same, also for coverage. How can we retrieve those percentages? @mellowo did you figure it out?
I am actually working on _Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanii_, and _Pseudomonas aeruginosa._ I will let you know if I manage to create one for _Pseudomonas aeruginosa_. Thank you.