Nikolay Bekirov
Nikolay Bekirov
Anyone out there?
Thank you, @olleolleolle! I'll look int this :)
@kares, my bad - assumed that listing those only in the reproduction script is enough. My original application setup is: - **rails: 4.2.7.1** (want to upgrade to 4.2.11) - **activerecord-jdbcpostgresql-adapter:...
With my 9.2.5.0 it is failing. ```bash $ ruby -v jruby 9.2.5.0 (2.5.0) 2018-12-06 6d5a228 Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 9.0.1+11 on 9.0.1+11 +jit [darwin-x86_64] ``` My idea is that...
Just in case anyone needs a fast and dirty workaround, here's a monkey-patch I came up with: ```ruby module ArJdbc module PostgreSQL def respond_to_missing?(method_name, _include_private = false) # Allow proper...
@seuros, no actually. For me, it was enough that path size of 49 was not calling `find_by_large_path` thus keeping it all to a single query (with ~50 inner-joins) and then...
Sorry, already out office. ☺️ I’m available next Tuesday and will try if you haven’t during the weekend.
Now that I think of it, why would we even keep the if checking for “large paths”. We can just always split in groups of size n. For n
@seuros, here's the promised data: - `rails c` log before the change (using `in_groups`) - [in_groups.log](https://github.com/ClosureTree/closure_tree/files/3151467/in_groups.log) - after the change (using `in_groups_of`) - [in_groups_of.log](https://github.com/ClosureTree/closure_tree/files/3151466/in_groups_of.log) - along with the DB explain...