Takahiro Morishita
Takahiro Morishita
@astrofrog I would like to second acikota's first point --- the functionality seems to return an image that conserves surface flux density (e.g., count/pixel) but not total flux per area...
The summed values (np.sum(scaled_psf)) I see here are e.g.: - F200W - w wing: ~0.99222 - w/o wing: ~0.95676 - F277W - w wing: ~0.839 - w/o wing: ~0.800 -...
Thanks, @mperrin. That explains why I see more significant offsets in the red filters. Just checked additional F150W and found that it has ~0.99-1, similar to what I see in...
Hi @mperrin ,sorry to reopen the ticket that was closed. I was working on a scene with galaxy as input, instead of point source in the question above, and found...
@bhilbert4 yes. For this specific case, I see ~18.5% more counts in the Mirage final seed compared to the output from ETC. Note that both agreed within ~2% level when...
Hi @bhilbert4, any thoughts or updates on this possible issue?
Hi @bhilbert4 thanks for investigating while you are busy. > because the galaxy stamp should already have its signal scaled to the correct value. This seems to be right and...
@bhilbert4 @NorPirzkal Thanks! I just ran the same notebook and could run through without having any issues. Would be great if either @jotaylor or @swara13 can confirm this when they...