Mark Solters

I have found this discussion (http://lists.cetic.be/pipermail/6lbr-dev/2014-October/000356.html) but I'm afraid it was not sufficiently concrete for me to understand how I would actually configure my `wpan0` 802.15.4 interface in the 6LBR...

Sure, the differentiation between the slip framed traffic and the actual traffic is something I do understand. But it seems to me that it would be faster to be able...

I had some luck using an AT86RF233 radio tied to the Raspberry Pi zero with SPI. I was able to get a phy interface in jessie and even tcpdump the...

Now that I read the whole thread here it seems to me that what we really need to get cooking is for @laurentderu to point us towards those references and...

For posterity, I will attach below the gist of the solution I arrived at. My solution may not be the most elegant one, but it gets the job done. I...

This problem still presents itself on the `develop` branch of 6LBR. When I configure the BR like so:  And then configure my nodes as such: ``` c #undef LLSEC802154_CONF_ENABLED...

I am compiling a fresh `develop` branch now. Can you please clarify: should I use the slip-radio from the official Contiki master, or should I compile the slip-radio from 6LBR?

Yes! It works, using the following configuration! - Raspberry Pi: using a freshly compiled `develop` branch with your latest commits. - Slip radio: CC2650 compiled against Contiki master branch -...

Actually, I have discovered a (in my case severe) limitation. It seems this only works for UDP datagrams up to (about) 47 bytes. I have a node that is simply...

I don't think that's what's causing this. If you mean this PR (https://github.com/contiki-os/contiki/pull/1258) it's been merged already. There is no instance of `PRIORITIZE_NEW_PACKETS` anywhere in Contiki's master branch. I wonder...