Mike Rodriguez

https://github.com/day8/re-frame/issues/644#issuecomment-687107121 I agree with this. I do like the idea of events being maps. However it concerns me that in large codebase it could become error prone to have vectors...

> i) I don't think we want to force a particular log library on users; there was some discussion of this on #425 (comment) in the context of issue 275....

I like the idea of `:rule-filters` although, I think it should be `:production-filters` to be inclusive of possibly queries (they don't need to be special cased). I have more to...

@wandersoncferreira So it sounds like our opinions differ on the subject of to mini-DSL or not. I'm still more of a fan, DSL or not, of having `:production-exclusions` and `:production-inclusions`...

@WilliamParker > My reason for suggesting having the exclusions and inclusions in a single ordered data structure was to allow for having well-defined priority between them. Otherwise expressing use-cases like...

I think there is probably an issue here. However, it seems like this example is just so confusing that it is hard to even know what the "right semantics" should...

However, looking back to #373 it does seem to me that just having the order of conditions and order when bindings are present vs not be based on the order...

@WilliamParker pointed out to me that the `clara.rules.compiler/AlphaRootsWrapper` is meant to solve a similar problem. Perhaps that idea can be used here as well - ie wrapping the results of...

@rbrush > I am wondering if this goes far enough, though. For instance, the tuned-group-by function would be prone to a similar issue, although that is in a hot code...

@WilliamParker @rbrush > Perhaps the instance check in the equals method isn't quite as cheap as expected and we should remove it? It isn't strictly necessary as discussed at #397...