MollyM

Results 61 comments of MollyM

Any update on the plans to rename the js-ipfs project @BigLep @achingbrain?

yes - I do see a number of errors: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/618519/147994354-36a2a07f-6b4e-4f4f-a26c-639be439894b.png) The locales issues seem to show up as soon as the application loads (and while it is operating correctly) --...

Happened again: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/618519/148868239-e99589a0-762c-48cb-9e2d-cf9071ec4da2.png) har file attached: [broken-webui.har.zip](https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs-webui/files/7843105/broken-webui.har.zip)

Lots of updates so far!

Yes please! On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 1:02 PM Jessica Schilling wrote: > Is this OK to PR against the ipfs.io website to update this link? > [image: image]...

Alternate idea: expansion up until each page is the same size as a google docs window (816px?) - meaning in split view the page would be 1632px total. Reasoning -...

This is exciting! Anything needed from us on the IPFS side to land this? (cc @aschmahmann @stebalien @lidel)

I saw this was also tagged in the most recent release (https://github.com/turt2live/matrix-media-repo/releases/tag/v1.1.0)! Exciting stuff. =]

I don't think that was quite the intended approach, @johnnymatthews. This issue came from sourcing/identifying additional mechanisms to heal from hypothetical DOS attacks against the pre-configured IPFS bootstrap node list...

Maybe we can just start with this list [here (content provider list)](https://docs.ipfs.io/how-to/peering-with-content-providers/#content-provider-list)? but probably better to have dedicated nodes with higher connection limits to act as potential bootstrap nodes...