Maaz
Maaz
Hi Pierre: just wanted to check if you have an estimate for when you think this will be merged. I'd love to use it! No pressure at all. Or as...
Thanks, will do!
Muhammad Maaz [email protected]
I've simplified and refactored the loop. For example there's no need to traverse backwards, many quantities are reused, so I precompute at the beginning of the loop, and so on....
Thanks for the quick review! I agree with all your points. I'll implement a function that obtains a sample points in an open interval that is an integer, if possible,...
Thanks. I had a look at your code as well as the related PR #23077 where they use resultants. I'm not sure what is going on in `.lift()` either, so...
@oscarbenjamin Thanks for the changes. I'm catching up on them today. I ran into some issues trying to get your changes into my branch. Admittedly I'm not very experienced with...
I think I got it working and merged in your changes. I've used the new functionality in #26812 to simplify algebraic expressions by constructing the appropriate algebraic domain. For example,...
Sounds good. I'll break the implementation into smaller PRs. I think the best way would be: subresultant and reducta stuff, then the projection operators, then the CAD function itself which...
Sorry, been busy with the start of the semester! I think it makes sense to split out the subresultant and the reducta stuff first. The new subresultant functions are computing...