Matvey Kraposhin

Hi, can you specify name of OpenFOAM version which you are using? Tell also which version of the training track you want run

Hi, @MarcusAW ! Yes, the library just calculates response to transient aerodynamic forces for given observer points. However, I would start your simulation from timeStart=1s, when you have already the...

It's hard to suggest how long you should run your simulation, since the number of time slices (points) influences accuracy of acoustic spectrum. I think, you can just rerun the...

Hi, thank you. I'll check source code. That seems like a strange behaviour. We checked parallel runs many times.

> I also tested Tutorials/shockTubeTwoGases case (v2212). The serial calculation ran well, but the parallel calculation crashed midway. (I only changed the numberOfSubdomains) [logerror.txt](https://github.com/unicfdlab/hybridCentralSolvers/files/10664530/logerror.txt) I am confused now. Can anyone...

> Hello, I ran a high-speed combustion case in parallel successfully with reactingPimpleCentralFoam on OpenFOAMv1912. Now I need to run it on v2212 for further work. I get an error....

The problem comes from this part of the code (YEqn.H, lines 224-240): forAll(maxDeltaY.boundaryField(), iPatch) { if (maxDeltaY.boundaryField()[iPatch].coupled()) { scalarField intF = maxDeltaY.boundaryField()[iPatch].primitiveField(); scalarField intH = hLambdaCoeffs.boundaryField()[iPatch]; const scalarField& intL =...

It looks like something has changed in inter-processor boundaries handling. I think, you can proceed with the curent solution. I'll check what particularly has changed on weekend and then will...

Hi, I did an amendment, it is available in my repository. I think, @unicfdlab will merge it soon. Thank you for reporting the bug!

Hi, could you please point to the line of source code that confuses you?