missing-user

Results 17 comments of missing-user

I added an example config for the axysymmetric test case to the CI @jonathanschilling , it runs in about half the time and reaches the same result as the reference...

> I think, as far as I can tell without much more effort, that this is ready for merging. > > @jloizu Could you maybe also have a look and...

Just a bump @smiet , @jloizu to bring this back to attention, is there anything else you need from my side to merge?

I also replaced print with logger.info in two places that stood out to me.

Replaced deprecated np.product with np.prod for numpy 2.0 support

> Looks good to me. I think the failing tests are unrelated to the changes in this PR. Let's see if we can fix those in master. Anyone have ideas...

The question was promted because I noticed that some parts of SPEC were running on one thread, eventho they should have been OMP parallel (e.g. poincare, virtual casing) After a...