michaelglasson

RPN is the best way I know to do nested calculations without the need for parentheses. I strongly support this proposal.

Hi @adamecr, my colleague and I have confirmed some really good news about DMNEngine. In code, we found that we can pass arrays and other complex data structures to a...

@adamecr, I am not sure what I have done to cause you to devote so much of your 'hobby time' to my enquries, but thank you very much. I think...

I also have a use case in which the list to be checked may be different for different rules. As you can see, one rule test the input list to...

No, I don't think DMNEngine supports either the use of ? or the variable name in the inputParameter. Exception while parsing the expression list==list.Contains(5) and Exception while parsing the expression...

Now all I have to do is find the place in the DMNEngine code where this logic is handled.

OK. The SfeelParser is the component that puts in left == right like this: _// string in "" "", number,variable name, .. - compare for eq conditionParts.Add($"{leftSide}=={part}");_ Maybe we can...

Those changes might just enrich DMNEngine enough to allow me to express all the rules in my use cases. I agree that hacks are not necessarily the best way to...

As an alternative to the SFeel vs Dynamic Expresso approach might be to enable the DMN feature that allows the expression language to be set for the whole DMN, for...

And once again thanks for your engagement. I am an Australian enterprise architect looking for a solution for embedding rule processing within a larger .Net application. If we can do...