Minh Phuong Nguyen

Hi David, Thank you for your comment. I have tried your suggestion by adding both lines: /gate/physics/addProcess RadioactiveDecay /gate/physics/addProcess Decay Below is the result when I adjust the physics list:...

Hi David, Thank you for your message. I will check your example. My first impression is that TrackLength would not represent positron range because the positron does not go with...

Below is an example of tracking a positron from its I-124 emission location (0, 0, 0) to its annihilation position, obtained from GATE. Both the StepLength and the TrackLength represent...

Hi David, I finally take a look at your codes and run the draft benchmark. The codes look correct to me. I see that you set for the environment using...

Hi Muhammad, Thanks for checking this also. How much activity did you simulate? Could you share your macro and data file? Best, Minh On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 9:00...

Hi Muhammad, Thank you for sending me your F-18 positron range simulation data to my email. Your result is very similar to what David and I got. As calculated from...

Hi David, I have tested the new benchmark, and got the same result as the benchmark version that I tried last time. Is it true that only some lines in...

I want to come back on this issue that the angular definition of the emission still does not work for ion sources. I also tried with Ac-225, and it did...