mhov
mhov
I still need to include some inline documentation
@Hoverbear just checking that this branch would not be buildable/testable (outside of my local) until merged with a full release?
Got it, i forgot that you'll generate them locally when you build anyways.
ok re-committed with the `pgXX.rs` changes omitted, keeping the `pgXX.h` changes.
Parking this PR for now until the proper fixes for Date/Timestamp infinity values are completed.
This is the last missing feature I'd need for my company to start migrating our c->pgx! A zero copy implementation like `pgx::Array` would be awesome. Even just exposing these functions...
@johnrballard there's a yet-to-be PR'd task I'm working on for +/- infinity Timestamps which Range would also depend on for `tsrange/tstzrange` This draft PR is rather old and @workingjubilee has...
@workingjubilee So this is using PG's timestamp formatting (via `pg_sys::EncodeDateTime`) vs the format used by `time` crate in the original serialization approach. I moved to this (now not realizing the...
When i was doing Timestamp type PR, I had to add these lines https://github.com/tcdi/pgx/blob/48faf5d9824e435b13ed18c6f9134f90305dd519/pgx-tests/src/tests/datetime_tests.rs#L413 to prevent my local timezone from impacting the timezone values.
i've added some background to the storage layout and some important qualifying info to the methods/accessors