Michael Bartling
Michael Bartling
Hey @alejoseb, Thanks for letting us know, completely forgot about this change in the latest couple of mbed-os releases. Give me a few min, will try to fix it now...
Update, can confirm this is actually an issue with mbed OS. Going to raise an issue with them now.
https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-os/issues/10548 https://github.com/ARMmbed/mbed-os/issues/10547
@kjbracey-arm the uTensor codebase was designed around vanilla C++11 for portability. Do you see any issues with enabling gnu extensions limiting the scope of uptake? If not I have no...
I guess the build profiles are mbed specific anyways so there really is not harm updating them to the gnu extensions for the time being.
@metanav you can get around the dirent issue by commenting out the following line. https://github.com/uTensor/uTensor/blob/develop/uTensor/util/uTensor_util.cpp#L3
I like the idea of chaining, but what do you mean by setAddress?
Force addressing here is kinda scary, especially if you rope in linker scripts like most people do in production environments
Method chaining can also be done super efficiently :D