Matt T. Proud

Results 18 comments of Matt T. Proud

Yeah, I definitely share your sentiments. Unpredictable user-interactive latency in bash (thanks to operating system packages contributing surprising behavior in run-parts directories) put me over the edge one day, and...

> Thank you for your feature request. To me this sounds a lot like #7 but a different API for the same result, correct me if I am wrong. On...

I am planning on retiring the `v1` branch (unless someone gives me a very good reason). `v1` will remain, though. I'm a bit concerned about extra churn there. The last...

OK. It's pushing the version as little as required? I think that's OK. Let me ruminate on this a little and then get back to you soon.

That is a good question: How many things require root: systemd interactions and bind mounting and privilege setting with subcommands? Do you think it would be easy to ensure that...

> evidence about being "error-prone" be available for discussion. I have not seen a particularly cogent demonstration of these to date (at least in defect reports), which is not to...

From my end, yes; that would generally suffice. Would we want to care about preservation and lifetime semantics as we have with the internal API? It serves a necessary purpose....

I see. Would you want to add a note to the fields to indicate that the values should be provided as literals according to a format dictated by an external...

FWIW: I found the "options"-laden names confusing when studying the new API. I literally asked myself as I was reading the APIs: "Options, but for what? What's taking them?"

Can you please furnish a link that does not require a login? Tobias Baube ***@***.***> schrieb am Fr. 11. Feb. 2022 um 19:29: > CVE-2021-3121 - > https://dependencies.abaservices.ch/vulnerability/?source=NVD&vulnId=CVE-2021-3121 > ------------------------------...