Mahafuzur Rahman

I've looked into scylla before, but scylladb as of now is mostly cassandra 2.x compliant which is no longer supported. Express-Cassandra specialises in casssandra 3.x+ and I don't have any...

@thelordoftheboards I guess it's atleast 2.4 that may be worth trying due to several reasons: 1. Materialized View is expected to be production ready 2. Secondary indexes is expected to...

scylladb secondary index and materialized view implementation is buggy as of this rc release. It looks like materialized views are handled the same way as indexes which is not compatible...

I'll keep this issue open and when scylladb version 3 gets out of rc, I would like to try it again.

> It looks like materialized views are handled the same way as indexes which is not compatible with Cassandra. Moreover if a materialized view and a secondary index use the...

@josiahjohnston thanks for the report, I've just prepared a fix for it. You'll now be able to disable automated type checks for a specific field by setting a model schema...

Good point. We have existing users of the library who rely on the data type validation of express-cassandra. Hence adding a common configuration to disable the built in type checks...

There was no plan for it, but as I can understand from your use case, adding `before_read` seems like a good idea. It would be great if you could try...

@jcbarton I remember you had developed some sort of decorator package for TypeScript to use with express-cassandra loadSchema. Do you have any thoughts regarding this?

@rennanboni is it possible to wrap express-cassandra to additionally provide typescript types support, so it can easily get future updates? I've never used typescript, so it won't be very comfortable...