Martin Holmer

@nikhilwoodruff and @MaxGhenis, If you have identified a bug (as discussed in issue #2641), why don't you submit a pull request that fixes the bug?

@jdebacker, Thanks for providing in #1515 the link to the CBPP review of the literature.

Now that I have read the three papers (and one newspaper article) cited in issue #1515, I have a couple of comments about how best to model the effects of...

@MattHJensen said in the #1515 discussion of CIT modeling approaches: > Currently and in the foreseeable future [until OG-USA is more developed], our best foundation for developing that comprehensive table...

@MattHJensen said in #1515: > I believe the way TPC, CBO, JCT, and OTA think about this (all of whom do have general equilibrium models, by the way) ... Yes,...

**Summary** Summarizing the #1515 discussion of how best to include the effects of corporate income taxes (CIT) in Tax-Calculator, there seems to be consensus on a few central points: -...

Tax-Calculator issue #1515 --- entitled "How best to include the effects of corporate income taxes?" --- is in the process of being resolved by @codykallen's work in the BRC repository,...

@MattHJensen raised issue #229 in April 2015 and there has been no discussion since then. Three of the seven boxes have been checked leaving four of the original goals unchecked....

A TaxBrain user asked: > For example, assume that in step 1 all deductions, exemptions, and credits (including EITC) are eliminated. A married or head of household tax return showing...

@MattHJensen, What's the status of Tax-Calculator issue #1557? Is there any reason to leave it open?