Markus Lehtonen
Markus Lehtonen
## Describe the Enhancement: I use markdown "magic" to specify class of some headers and I'd like to enable MD022. It should be possible to have something like this: ```...
**What would you like to be added**: Add a config file option to disable hooks of the `local` feature source, e.g. ``` sources: local: hooksEnabled: true # true by default...
**What would you like to be added**: Deprecate and eventually remove support for hooks in the `local` feature source. **Why is this needed**: In #855 @eero-t had a merituos pondering...
Extend the format of feature matcher terms (the elements specified under under matchFeatures) with new matchName field. This field contains an expression that is evaluated against the names of features...
Add tests covering the basic functionality of NodeFeatureRule objects, covering different feature types ("flag features", "attribute features" and "instance features") as well as backreferencing (using the output of previously run...
**What would you like to be added**: Re-organize the *Get started* major section of documentation. Probably spitting it into multiple separate major sections. E.g. something like - get-started/ - introduction...
**What would you like to be added**: Spun out from https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/node-feature-discovery/pull/640#issuecomment-968687743: > Other Helm apps may also want to add NFD as a dependency. Actually, custom/local NFD sources look like...
**What would you like to be added**: We start to have a lot of somewhat cluttered features/labels related to security and trusted-execution-environments (e.g. #647, #790, #830) and expecting more to...
**What would you like to be added**: Now that nfd-worker has quite extensive support for dynamic run-time configurability through its config file, I started to think would it be good...
**What would you like to be added**: Better document the purpose of different deployment options. Spun off of https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/node-feature-discovery/pull/640#issuecomment-968687743 > I mean that we should probably accept the different deployment...