Mark Salter comments

Results 5 comments of


                                            Mark Salter

Standalone BItMap - for LIS5, but perhaps portable?

Looking at test failures

Standalone BItMap - for LIS5, but perhaps portable?

Added check for fld[65] existence, but this is tied into:- Issues: 1. Backward compatibility and performance of pack operations 2. variable fld location for 'Standalone' BitMap, tracking and processing.

Standalone BItMap - for LIS5, but perhaps portable?

I have issues running the tests on windows, so please consider this pull request held and take care in using any part of it!

Standalone BItMap - for LIS5, but perhaps portable?

On 30/09/2014 02:34, Alejandro Revilla wrote: > FYI, I've ran the tests locally, not all, but some of the problems > happen in ISOBasePackager line 103 where you check for...

Standalone BItMap - for LIS5, but perhaps portable?

On 02/10/2014 22:18, Manuel83 wrote: > The BitMap was not set into DE 65 automatically if I set a fields above > 128 and in addition the bit in the...