Marcus More-Thiesen

The same issue happens when the type that it tries to figure out is actually generic over multiple levels: ```graphql type Query { item: Item! } type Item { id:...

Same with 22.3.1: ``` /usr/bin/ld: /home/marcus/.sdkman/candidates/java/22.3.1.r19-grl/lib/static/linux-amd64/glibc/libnio.a(UnixNativeDispatcher.o): in function `Java_sun_nio_fs_UnixNativeDispatcher_mknod0': UnixNativeDispatcher.c:(.text.Java_sun_nio_fs_UnixNativeDispatcher_mknod0+0x44): undefined reference to `__xmknod' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status at org.graalvm.nativeimage.builder/com.oracle.svm.hosted.image.NativeImageViaCC.handleLinkerFailure(NativeImageViaCC.java:204) at org.graalvm.nativeimage.builder/com.oracle.svm.hosted.image.NativeImageViaCC.runLinkerCommand(NativeImageViaCC.java:151) at org.graalvm.nativeimage.builder/com.oracle.svm.hosted.image.NativeImageViaCC.write(NativeImageViaCC.java:117) at org.graalvm.nativeimage.builder/com.oracle.svm.hosted.NativeImageGenerator.doRun(NativeImageGenerator.java:718) at...

This is a minimum test case for me: ``` import java.io.File; import java.io.IOException; import java.net.URI; import java.nio.file.FileSystem; import java.nio.file.FileSystems; import java.nio.file.Path; public class FileSystemTest { public static void main(String[] args)...

So I have a workaround, which is basically just building on an older Ubuntu, e.g. 20.04. Building a mostly static image also works, at least it links, I am not...

Yes, with this version linking against `musl` works. Nontheless, the issue that it does not work on newer standard GLIBC will be adressed, or is this just not supported anymore?

There are no DFS related messages on `logread -f hostapd` .... actually, there are also no mesh related messages there, because that goes through wpa_supplicant if I understand correctly. The...

I tested with fully package updated 23.05.2 (`hostapd-common - 2023-09-08-e5ccbfc6-6`) just now and it looks no different than before, no 160Mhz channel on the mesh, same output of `iw dev`:...

So I played with `24.10-rc4` and understanding that the rational is that `iw` does not support HS modes the issue still seems to persist, even wit `iw` in version 6.9...

So it works when I configure `104 (5520 Mhz)` with 160 Mhz wide channels. (Why is that referred to as 114 though?) Why hoes wpa_supplicant have a different idea of...