Marco Beierer

@asaskevich first of all, thank you for this nice library. Just a short notice: the use of int validation on type int64 did work in the past. I discovered the...

Hi @elico I'm sorry, I missed your comment in January. It's hard to remember what exactly the problem was at the time, but I can confirm that it has been...

@glebteterin Thank you for reporting the issue. I have no time to fix the issue currently, but am open for pull requests...

Hi @ChemicalRocketeer Thank you for your pull requests. I had a look at the issue and you are absolutely right, we shouldn't abort on status code 125. Unfortunately I think...

I can confirm that it works great in the current state. I use it for some time for scaffolding my applications and maintain only a small list of nice-to-have improvements....

@runem Thank you for your great work. Quick question: Are you interested in adding support for [web types](https://github.com/JetBrains/web-types) or would your prefer if we maintain a fork?

@jpradelle Thank you for the info, good to know :+1:

Hi @saward I ran into the same issue today with three schema where tables with the same name existed in two schema. I tried your PR, but it didn't solve...

Just a side note: proto3 has experimental support for `optional` fields since [version 3.12.0](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/tag/v3.12.0). You can find detailed information in the [field presence docs](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/v3.12.0/docs/field_presence.md#how-to-enable-explicit-presence-in-proto3). Thus fields now can be `null`...

Hi, I'm also working on a closed-source photo application aimed at professional photographers. I also had a look at pig.js and the medium article at the time I have implemented...