Mark Larah

Coming back to this! Thanks for the detailed thoughts y'all :) > - But I think it worth to use something like :: as separator for enum values. > -...

ok here's an early sketch of what I have so far for the nodes: https://gist.github.com/magicmark/16bd0d7fbb987fc7f75b536993bdbaa5 (warning: i am dumb frontend developer. No real idea what i'm doing here other than...

@kaylie-alexa @benmvp would it make sense to marry this somehow with https://github.com/yarnpkg/rfcs/pull/107 ? What are you thoughts here? This implies increased scope for this RFC, but I'm sorta interested in...

Separate command sounds entirely reasonable to me. I'll revise the RFC :)

@bestander I've updated the RFC. Still working on a code implementation (which will also help me answer some of the questions I still have regarding the implementation details in the...

@sejoker Thank you for this info. Looks like it makes sense for the other RFC to contain most of the logic for this as it is more generalised. There could...

@bestander sounds good to me. I've given my feedback in #68, I'll await @victornoel: > Actually, there was good reason to discuss that here (so no problem with the hijacking...

So quite a lot has changed since the initial draft of this RFC - namely the introduction of the new [Selective dependency resolutions](https://yarnpkg.com/lang/en/docs/selective-version-resolutions/#toc-why-would-you-want-to-do-this) API. I think it makes sense to...

@bestander Updated the RFC and trimmed it down a bit. I think it's in a good place to be reviewed again. (tl;dr this is mostly now a dumb wrapper around...

super gross, i'm sure there's a better answer out there, but in case not...here's what i came up with ```python def fix_directives_in_sdl_introspection(handler, registry): def fix_sdl(request): response = handler(request) if (...