Matt Bossart
Matt Bossart
@jd-lara Would this change also allow for using a device as the frequency ` ReferenceBus` that doesn't have frequency as a dynamic state (Droop GFM)?
Yeah it seems like the current implementation is limited to devices that have frequency as a state that is therefore already stored in the result.
@avik-pal Can you point me to where this should be implemented. I'm trying to transition from `NLsolve.jl` to `NonlinearSolve.jl` but for some larger cases `NLsolve.jl` converges and `NonlinearSolve.jl` does not...
Thanks. I will try to look into it
We should check that these corrections do not impact the large case validations that are run from an exported file because the data should all be corrected when it is...
An open question is coming up with a set of rules for determining what is a parameter and what is not? For example, non Float values (ie Flags) are not...
@jd-lara should this still be open?
Thanks for linking that issue. There is an [example ](https://docs.sciml.ai/SciMLSensitivity/stable/examples/dde/delay_diffeq/) and a [test ](https://github.com/SciML/SciMLSensitivity.jl/blob/master/test/layers_dde.jl) along with other mentions of compatibility for DDEs so I figured there was some support?
Ok. And just to clarify `ReverseDiffAdjoint()` is considered direct differentiation not adjoint?
> whihc will auto register all the rules and other optimizations by marking it pow-like So this would replace all of the custom rules? Or in addition?