ZhenlinLiang
ZhenlinLiang
I try again but still get same error, and save nothing, cost almost 2 days `what(): /home/ubuntu/preprocess/preprocess/wet_lines_main.cc:71 in void Retrieve::Add(util::StringPiece, const Extract&) threw util::Exception because `!extracts.empty() && extracts.back().paragraph_num ber >...
@Celebio Thanks for your reply, i try `zcat seamless.dataset.metadata.public.arb-enA.tsv.gz | egrep ^crawl-data | tr '\t' ' ' | sort -k1 -k4 | build/bin/wet_lines`, but got `terminate called after throwing an...
Still have another question.. After I divided the audio according to the start frame and end frame, I found that the corresponding translated text was only part of the corresponding...
> hi @lzl-mt , The `wet_lines` tool will rebuild only the text part, not the audio part. To rebuild the audio, you can refer to the [doc](https://github.com/facebookresearch/seamless_communication/blob/main/docs/m4t/seamless_align_README.md), the section "For...
> > translated text was only part of the corresponding output text (the output corresponding to wet_lines). > > You need to extract the sentence from the paragraph by [using...
> The hosted audio may have changed in the meantime. We plan to provide additional metadata with the duration we expect the mp3 file to be. how should i use...
I try again but still get same error, and save nothing, cost almost 2 days `what(): /home/ubuntu/preprocess/preprocess/wet_lines_main.cc:71 in void Retrieve::Add(util::StringPiece, const Extract&) threw util::Exception because !extracts.empty() && extracts.back().paragraph_num ber >...
另外，默认的这些配置： chunk_size=[12, 15], stride=[8, 10], pad_left=[0, 0], encoder_att_look_back_factor=[4, 4], decoder_att_look_back_factor=[1, 1], 对于不同的chunksize的话，stride、pad_left、encoder_att_look_back_factor、decoder_att_look_back_factor 这些参数都不需要修改吗 只用修改chunk_size么
> Hi, > > I set `inputs_embeds` as `(num_tokens, embed_dim)` and get the following issues. Are there any advice? Thanks. > >  @DarkLight1337 I also meet this issue. When...
> @yukang2017 @lzl-mt I had accidentally introduced a bug with batching. That part should be fixed now. Can you please verify that you no longer see index out of range...