lukesg08

Documenting the usage of command line arguments being passed to the sandbox

Documentation for handling system arguments (I think somewhere it's tucked away that pedal can't handle it...but not sure)

So CAIT actually wraps AST nodes in CAIT nodes, but mirrors all of the base AST node functionality so that you SHOULD be able to treat them as AST nodes...

Starting a checklist of additional items we might want to address. I'll edit here as I find more things - [ ] More in-depth autograder integration example. E.g. many instructors...

Yes, this would be sys.args. I'd expect this would actually be something in the run function from the sandbox for Pedal, but I didn't see an option for that in...

I think the intuitive assumption is if feedback with negative valence is triggered, they would subtract their score (or add their negative score) when triggered since negative valence means something...

Maybe, but if we think from a traditional rubric, our point oriented system resembles either analytic rubrics or single-point/check list rubrics. If you break down an analytic rubric, you can...

I thought that was the point of the valence flag? Negative valence means that activating this feedback is bad, and thus points should be deducted, and positive valence meaning this...

When following the basic instructions on the documentation, got: ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/pedal", line 8, in sys.exit(main()) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/pedal/command_line/command_line.py", line 69, in main return pipeline(args).execute() File...

I actually did realize that the hashtag doesn't get copied correctly. I tried the example again, with the updates pulled and now I get absolutely nothing in my results.json file...