Ludvig af Klinteberg
Ludvig af Klinteberg
Sure, no reason not to simplify. Seems to be a merge conflict at the moment though
Merging stale PR
This still appears to be an issue, even after switching to GSL 2.5. Interestingly, the error estimate provided by GSL is also completely off ```julia using GSL, PyPlot, PyCall x...
That's too bad. There actually seems to be quite a few bug reports on gsl_sf_hyperg_2F1. Let's just hope they get fixed in a future version.
I don't think GSL has hypergeometric functions for complex arguments.
> I don't think GSL has hypergeometric functions for complex arguments. Sorry, that was wrong, there's actually `sf_hyperg_2F1_conj`, which could be called from `hypergeom` for the right arguments.
I've never tried out the `multilarge_nlinear` interface, so I'm afraid I can't be of much help here. The high-level driver might not have made it into this interface because the...
This might be a duplicate of https://github.com/JuliaMath/FFTW.jl/issues/200 and https://github.com/JuliaMath/FFTW.jl/issues/275
> Can we require FFTW 3.3.9 instead of 3.3.6? 3.3.9 Is quite old now. This should be fine from the Julia standpoint since the latest FFTW.jl (v1.8.0) uses FFTW v3.3.9....
I submitted an issue on FFTW.jl with the smallest FINUFFT-free example that I could get to crash: https://github.com/JuliaMath/FFTW.jl/issues/306