luclaurent
luclaurent
I think the second proposition is better. I am not sure this pattern could have collision but I must try to manually add `%` in the LaTeX file to check...
[Answer from LaTexML's developer](https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/issues/1393): no solution is available in LaTeXML. Best way seems to remove `%\n` with regex. Collision could appear with intentional adding of `%\n` (maybe not :-))
Yes but not this week.
Add new test process!!
Follow https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/pull/2024 and maybe adapt to future LateXML release.
Same behaviour on macos. [Probably due to depreciation of `distutils`](https://peps.python.org/pep-0632/)
Two solutions could be considered: - add `setuptools` as requirement: it includes `distutils` - remove the use to `distutils` and replace it by `shutil` as we only need to use...
@nennigb see [branch](https://github.com/nennigb/amc2moodle/tree/fix-distutils) for the second solution of my previous post
With `pip` no issue probably due to the fact that `setuptools` is installed when you create a new environment. With `pipx` (`pip install pipx`) it does not work.
Great, we can use coverage.py directly in hatch as package management system: https://hatch.pypa.io/1.13/tutorials/testing/overview/#measuring-code-coverage