lpalbou

Hi David, unfortunately I can't share the full keys for confidentiality reasons. But it seems there are some issues with the recursivity while looking for keys under different "sub-folders" (sub-prefixes...

Hi Suzy, A partial solution to your problem is: https://api.geneontology.cloud/go/GO_0060070/hierarchy which indicates both the parents & children of one GO term (not two). I plan also to make a more...

Correct, this query is for general purpose but I should be able to create the two specific queries you mentioned by next week.

@selewis sorry, I am a bit late on this but I have deployed a route this morning to answer your first question: [http://api.geneontology.cloud/association/subclass/{goid1}/{goid2}]( http://api.geneontology.cloud/association/subclass/GO:0030182/GO:0048856) => return true if and only...

@selewis I also saw your question about 'do_not_manually_annotate' or 'do_not_annotate' tags. There is no specific route for this question only, but you can see if those tags are present in...

@selewis I have updated the API to be more consistent with BioLink syntax and to determine if two terms are related for any of `is_a`, `part_of` or `regulates` relationships: *...

As an example, it seems the label of GO:0003674 have recently changed from molecular_function to molecular_activity, presumably following the GO-CAM specs discussion ? A [query to GOLr](http://golr-aux.geneontology.io/solr/select?fq=document_category:%22ontology_class%22&q=*:*&wt=json&rows=2&fq=annotation_class:%22GO:0003674%22&fl=annotation_class,annotation_class_label) will nonetheless shows...

@cmungall I suppose we can duplicate the current `slim` parameters in `subset` parameters, then tag all `slim` parameters as deprecated, hence giving notice to users they should not use the...

Well... if you want to put meta, then put also the label as the label of an object is IMO a meta, not the object itself nor a reference. More...

@deepakunni3 any update on that ? Thanks !