Lars Ellenberg

This should have become better with c856e930a05a50d491325fa119b035dd1a5e8f37 but it should actually be implemented as "send all the context information first, then (try to) apply the changes in one go" by...

Csync2 does not yet have a protocol command that communicates content and permissions and ownership and mtime and whatnot in one "transaction". Content is transferred first. Content is put in...

some comments with my "I know my way around csync2 code, I've been there before and it did not make me happy" hat on: The underlying problem is one of...

On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 14:05, ggs67 wrote: > > The title says it all ;-) I am actually asking because I am looking forward for more options in...

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 01:09:53AM -0800, stfast wrote: > Will you consider merging patches from schafdog csync2 fork. > Some nice extra features there. > https://github.com/schafdog/csync2 I should...

so if *any* side removes the file, it shall be removed everywhere, even if modified there since the last check? sounds dangerous. But yes, anyone, please feel free to implement...

That is not implemented. Heuristics to do that could possibly be added, using the signatures, base names or other recorded meta data. Any volunteers? If it is a "one-off" action...

I _think_ that is a list of patterns to be processed only in "compare" mode, `-o`, but not processed in normal check/update/whatever modes, unless also listed as include/exclude statements. Whether...

> I'm using csync2 in combination with lsync (to only start it when an > inotify happens) in a dynamic environment where the config files are > generated by Saltstack....

The mentioned commit is over 2.5 years old, if your favorite distribution did not pick that up meanwhile, that is not really csync2's fault ;-) But okay, I'll add a...